Sources and review
How a recommendation in Sig got there, and how much weight it can carry.
Who writes and reviews Sig's clinical content?
Sig's content is written by a Doctor of Pharmacy and reviewed by two additional Pharm.D. reviewers. Every item a named reviewer has not yet cleared is labeled In Development in the app. Every data set shows the date of last review, so review status is visible rather than assumed.
Sig will be published only once the author is a registered pharmacist. A named reviewer roster and a public corrections log are part of the launch plan.
Our data show that 384 of the 384 guideline records (100%) still carry the In Development label while review continues, as of November 3, 2026.
For example, a dose rule a reviewer has not yet cleared shows In Development beside the rule, and the About and Sources screen lists each data set with a review date. Additionally, content corrections reported through Report a Problem are checked against the cited source before any fix.
Where does Sig's drug information come from?
Sig's primary source is FDA-approved labeling, taken through DailyMed and openFDA, plus 384 published guidelines and labels across 15 specialties. Drug names and classes come from RxNorm and RxClass (National Library of Medicine), prices from CMS NADAC, and lactation data from LactMed.
For example, a renal dose rule in Sig names the FDA label section behind the rule, such as Dosage and Administration (2.1). New guideline content is drafted from a verbatim quote of 25 words or fewer, and a machine check rejects any quote not found word for word in the source.
Our data show that 100% of the 15,497 recommendations name the source section, and 34% also give a page number, as of November 3, 2026.
Additionally, where practice diverges from the label, Sig calls out the divergence and cites the practice source rather than blending the two. When two documents give different numbers, each keeps a separate row with a separate citation. Where a source needs a number and prints none, Sig says so.
What does "In Development" mean in Sig?
In Development means the item has been written and cited, but a named pharmacist reviewer has not yet cleared the item. The label is a signal to apply more of one's own scrutiny, not a statement the content is wrong. Sig shows review state openly, so a pharmacist can tell which parts have had a second review.
For example, a newly added guideline recommendation carries the In Development label until a named Pharm.D. reviewer checks the quote against the source document and clears the recommendation. Additionally, the About and Sources screen shows when each data set was last reviewed.
Our data show that 384 of the 384 guideline records (100%) carry the label today, as of November 3, 2026. Review is still in progress, and the label comes off an item only when a named reviewer clears the item.
How current is Sig's content?
Each bundled data set in Sig shows the date of last review. Dose rules, antimicrobial guidance, and boxed warnings are re-reviewed at least every six months. The counts on this site were taken from the app's catalogs on November 3, 2026.
Additionally, Sig is built so catalog corrections can arrive as signed content updates delivered through Apple. A correction then does not wait for an app update. Live data, for example labels, shortages, and recalls, reflects what the government service returned at the moment of the lookup.
The current editions in our data are: (1) the FDA Orange Book of October 9, 2026; (2) the FDA Purple Book release of September 2026; (3) the DailyMed archive of August 23, 2026 for pill identification; (4) federal and state controlled-substance schedules as of October 9, 2026.
Is Sig an FDA-cleared medical device?
No. Sig is reference and decision-support software for healthcare professionals and has not been reviewed or cleared by the FDA. Sig is built to sit within the clinical decision support description in section 520(o)(1)(E) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Any decision made by a pharmacist using Sig belongs to the pharmacist, under a personal license and judgment. Where Sig and the FDA-approved labeling or an institution's policy disagree, the labeling and the policy control.
Additionally, our data show the basis on every row: 100% of the 15,497 recommendations name the source section. The Terms of Use have stated that Sig is not a medical device since September 21, 2026.
For example, every Sig calculator result lists the inputs used, the method, and the citation, so the basis can be reviewed rather than trusted. According to the FDA's guidance on clinical decision support software, independent review by a healthcare professional is the criterion the design is built around.